Many of the criticisms here are legitimate, in that it will require a lot of voluntary effort before this takes on the Wiki-like profile the makers hope for, and at present the pickings are slim to none. But in terms of intent and fundamentals, the app couldnt be better. Therefore Im rating it based upon the genuine and worthy effort of its creators, and for the fact that what it does offer looks pretty much exactly the way Id like it to. If users are patient and continue to talk about it and contribute, momentum may lead to further funding and development, and the enormous potential of this app can be realized in short order.
E. Miaru about Buildings